Director of Communications and Public Relations
College of Arts & Sciences
ATLANTA—Young men can successfully intervene in peer groups to prevent sexual violence against women if they appeal to a shared sense of morality, according to a study led by a Georgia State University psychology researcher.
“There’s a new focus, especially on college campuses, on studying bystander intervention in preventing sexual violence,” said psychology professor Dominic Parrott, director of Georgia State’s Center for Research on Interpersonal Violence. “This was a chance to see what people do to intervene and what actually works. Our experiment allowed us to see what happens and why.”
In the study, pairs of young men who were friends were given the opportunity to discuss whether to show sexually explicit images to a young woman who did not wish to see the images. Some of the men consumed alcohol and others did not. The researchers then observed how some of the men were able to persuade their peer to refrain from showing the offensive images.
Their findings indicate that men who had confidence in their ability to intervene tended to make statements that recognized the young woman’s wishes and appealed to a shared sense of morality. These statements were critical to the young men’s ability to convince their friend to refrain from showing the offensive images, the researchers found.
“The most effective arguments were based in a pro-social morality – statements like ‘That’s just not the right thing to do.’ Statements of objective consideration – like, ‘We should do as she asks’ – were also effective,” Parrott said.
“There was a lot of talk among the peers in the experiment and not all of it was pro-social statements. But we saw that nothing except these pro-social arguments was effective in stopping this simulated sexual violence in the lab.”
When men in the study used statements based on gender stereotypes, Parrott said they were less effective in persuading their peers. These less effective statements included: “She seems like a nice girl, so I picked the non-sexually-explicit video.”
Parrott said he hopes the study will advance the discussion of how bystanders can help prevent sexual violence against women by illustrating what has been proven to work.
“The implication,” he said, “is if you are in a situation and you see something happening, whether it is misogynistic joke or talking about a woman who is not there in a disrespectful way … to something very overt, an effective way to defuse the situation is to make salient that morally this isn’t right …To say, ‘Hey, she doesn’t want this.’”
Parrott’s coauthors include Kevin M. Swartout, associate professor of psychology, and Volkan Topalli, professor of criminal justice and criminology, both of Georgia State; Danielle M. Purvis, senior project coordinator from the Yale University Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, and Andra Teten Tharp of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
The research was supported by a joint grant from the CDC and Georgia State and is published in the article “Speak Up! Prosocial Intervention Verbalizations Predict Successful Bystander Intervention for a Laboratory Analogue of Sexual Aggression” published in the journal Sexual Abuse.
Parrot’s research focuses on determinants of aggressive behavior, alcohol-related aggression and campus sexual violence.