
Media Contact
Holly Frew
Office of Communications & Marketing
Robinson College of Business
[email protected]
On April 2, Donald Trump announced that the United States would install a 10% tariff on imported products from nearly every country in the world in a matter of days, with country-specific rates to start on April 9. The Trump administration called it “Liberation Day,” but many economists worried the tariffs would make inflation soar and that the economy would incur significant damage.
The original rationale for tariffs stems from post-COVID realizations. From pharmaceuticals to rare earth metals, America discovered dangerous overreliance on a single country, most often China. Tariffs were supposed to correct this imbalance and reduce dependence on foreign suppliers.
But in execution, the policy has expanded far beyond critical industries. Tariffs now cover a wide swath of imports, including items with no viable domestic alternative.
Trump has imposed tariffs on some of the country’s largest trading partners: 15% on the European Union, 19% on Indonesia, 20% on Vietnam, 25% on Mexico and India, and 40% on Brazil. While some goods are tariff-exempt, for example, there is 0% for goods entered duty-free under the USMCA, the rates will inevitably have a drastic effect on business in the United States. But how and when?
Since “Liberation Day”, the US economy has defied many of those expectations by remaining relatively stable, raising the question about what impact Trump’s tariffs have already had or will have on consumer-good prices, manufacturing, the labor market, and other elements of the economy.
Dr. Sina Golara, assistant professor of Supply Chain and Operations Management at Georgia State’s Robinson College of Business, has reviewed data for several economic indicators to better understand the current and future effects of the new tariffs.

“Imposing tariffs on your trade partners acts as a tax. It’s a cost added to transactions between international buyers and sellers,” Golara said. “Taxing business parties makes their transaction activity more expensive. The effect of that would be to discourage both sides from expanding trade.”
Tariffs force businesses to face the difficult choice of paying more for the products they need or finding substitutes. Global supply chains have become hyper-efficient in that they find the cheapest producer of a good and maximize purchases from that route, which helps cost reduction, but it increases dependence, decreases options, and reduces flexibility, making it difficult for businesses to find substitutes for critical goods.
“It’s impossible not to act in response to tariffs,” Golara explained. “Businesses can pass the cost increase to consumers or reduce production costs by dropping economic activity, which is how GDP slows. That also means hiring fewer people, going into a hiring freeze, and maybe laying off employees.”
Though some imported goods have seen price increases, the broader wave of inflation has been milder than many feared. That’s partly due to businesses buying in bulk before tariffs hit, a practice called “front running,” and partly because consumers are switching to cheaper products, cutting non-essentials, or delaying purchases.
Still, inflation has ticked up modestly. Recent CPI data shows a slight month-over-month increase, though year-over-year figures remain manageable. Producer Price Index (PPI) numbers even suggest deflation in some sectors, indicating that many manufacturers are unable to pass rising costs onto consumers.
Golara said, “We have seen the employment numbers rapidly slowing, and the US economy is not adding jobs anywhere near the desired levels. Over the last three to four months, we have created an average of 30,000 to 40,000 jobs per month, compared to the previous 100,000. So, companies are taking a step back.”
As consumers become increasingly uncertain about job security, they spend less, which further reduces business revenue and leads to even more caution in hiring.
The holiday season could reveal the next phase of the tariff impact. If inflation rises sharply, we can expect further softening in the labor market. The “release valve” in the economic system is such that if inflation increases, hiring tends to decrease. If employment continues to decline, the Federal Reserve may implement rapid rate cuts to stabilize the economy.
While the economy remains strong on paper, the tariff era is proving costly. It hasn't yet brought back jobs as promised. Instead, it’s testing the resilience of businesses and workers caught between politics and the global marketplace.
Golara said that scaling back tariffs would be the most effective and straightforward solution. He pointed out that the administration already walked back its most aggressive proposals, adding exemptions and pauses. While a complete rollback is unlikely for political reasons, hollowing out the tariff structure while preserving its image may offer a path forward.
