
Media Contact
Anna Varela
Director of Communications and Public Relations
College of Arts & Sciences
[email protected]
ATLANTA —The experience of being bullied and its link to social confidence among young people with disabilities is complicated, and efforts to curb bullying shouldn’t be one-size-fits-all, according to a recent study from Georgia State University and the University of Alabama at Birmingham.
The study findings may inform strategies to combat bullying in schools, also referred to as peer victimization, especially for students with developmental disabilities.
Erin Tone, lead author and professor of psychology and neuroscience at Georgia State, said bullying and social confidence are often related but not always in ways we would expect.
“It made sense to us that anxious kids may be vulnerable to bullying and bullied kids may be vulnerable to anxiety, but we don’t know much about the chicken and the egg story,” Tone said.
In collaboration with former GSU professor Chris Henrich, Tone examined the relationship between social confidence and bullying. The team analyzed data from the nationally representative Special Education Elementary Longitudinal Study, which collected data on parents’ reports of their children being bullied by peers and student reports of their own level of social confidence over four years.
“We chose a population that we knew was likely really vulnerable,” Tone said. “These are kids with a varied array of disabilities, from those that are pretty invisible, like dyslexia, to those like autism spectrum disorder or orthopedic disabilities that may be highly visible, either because of behavior or because of observable physical limitations.”
The findings show that students fall into three groups, based on the observed relationship between peer victimization and social confidence over time.
One group, which was more likely to include younger girls with a range of disabilities, showed little relationship between social confidence and peer victimization, as group members reported high social confidence despite high levels of being bullied.
The second group was a small set of students who were more likely to have disabilities associated with visible physical limitations or behavioral differences. Tone said these students were the most likely to be bullied.
Finally, members of the largest group were more likely to be older and to have invisible disabilities. For these students, Tone and Henrich were surprised to find that having been bullied early in the data collection was associated with higher social confidence years later.
“The key point is that we really do see variability. You can't just say, ‘Kids with disabilities are more likely to get bullied, so they're more likely to be socially anxious.’ It's a much more complicated picture,” Tone said.
The findings suggest that efforts to combat bullying should recognize the unique risks of each individual to foster a more informed approach.
Tone said more work needs to be done to understand why some youth with disabilities may gain social confidence over time, despite having experienced early peer victimization, while others do not. It is possible, for example, that some bullied children get helped in ways that provide them with social skills that prove useful later.
“It’s opened up a lot more questions for us than it answered,” Tone said. “But we were hoping that it gives people working with disabled kids some impetus to think about positive-focused interventions and who might benefit particularly from those.”
The article, “Peer Victimization and Social Confidence in Youth With Disabilities,” was published by the Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology.
— By Stella Mayerhoff
Featured Researcher

Erin Tone
Professor
Neuroscience, Psychology
Dr. Tone is a clinical psychologist with special interests in the ways in which emotional states, particularly anxiety, affect social behavior in both adults and children. Current research projects in the lab examine the ways in which anxious people behave in social situations and the cognitive, emotional, and neural processes that contribute to both their adaptive and their maladaptive interactions.